AI Alignment & Training

What is RLHF?

Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback is the technique that transforms a raw language model into a helpful, harmless, and honest AI assistant. It is the secret ingredient behind ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

The Core Idea: Teaching AI What Humans Actually Want

Large language models are trained to predict the next word in a sequence. This makes them remarkably fluent, but fluency alone does not make an AI useful or safe. A model that can predict text perfectly might still produce toxic content, confidently state falsehoods, or ignore the user's actual intent.

RLHF solves this by adding a crucial training phase where the model learns to optimize for human preferences rather than just statistical likelihood. Instead of asking "What word is most likely next?", the model learns to ask "What response would a human find most helpful, accurate, and appropriate?"

Think of it this way: pre-training teaches the model to speak fluently. RLHF teaches it to speak wisely.

How RLHF Works: The Four-Step Pipeline

RLHF is not a single technique but a multi-stage training pipeline. Each step builds on the previous one, progressively refining the model's behavior.

Step 1

Pre-training on Text

The foundation model is trained on a massive corpus of internet text, books, and code. It learns grammar, facts, reasoning patterns, and the general structure of language. This produces a powerful but unaligned base model that can generate any kind of text, both good and bad.

Step 2

Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)

Human demonstrators write high-quality responses to a set of prompts, showing the model what ideal assistant behavior looks like. The model is fine-tuned on these human-written examples, learning the format, tone, and helpfulness expected of an AI assistant. This is sometimes called "behavior cloning."

Step 3

Training a Reward Model

Human evaluators are shown multiple model responses to the same prompt and asked to rank them from best to worst. These rankings are used to train a separate reward model that learns to predict which responses humans prefer. This reward model becomes an automated proxy for human judgment.

Step 4

Policy Optimization with PPO

The language model (now called the "policy") generates responses, and the reward model scores them. Using Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), a reinforcement learning algorithm, the policy is updated to produce responses that earn higher reward scores while staying close to the original SFT model to prevent degradation.

Why RLHF Makes Models Helpful and Safe

Without RLHF, a language model is like an encyclopedia with no filter. It knows everything but has no sense of what is appropriate, helpful, or harmful. RLHF addresses several critical problems:

Real-World Impact: Before RLHF, GPT-3 would frequently generate offensive content, follow harmful instructions, and produce rambling, unhelpful responses. After RLHF training, InstructGPT (the precursor to ChatGPT) was preferred by human evaluators 85% of the time over the base GPT-3 model, despite being 100 times smaller.

RLHF in the Real World

RLHF and its variants are used by virtually every major AI lab to train their flagship models:

Alternatives and Evolution Beyond RLHF

While RLHF was a breakthrough, researchers have developed several alternatives that address its limitations, including the complexity of training a separate reward model and the instability of PPO optimization.

DPO

Direct Preference Optimization eliminates the need for a separate reward model entirely. It directly optimizes the language model using human preference pairs, simplifying the pipeline to a single supervised learning step. Increasingly popular due to its simplicity and stability.

RLAIF

Reinforcement Learning from AI Feedback replaces human evaluators with an AI model that provides feedback. This dramatically reduces the cost and scales the feedback process, though it relies on the quality of the AI evaluator.

Constitutional AI

Developed by Anthropic, CAI gives the model a set of principles (a "constitution") and has it critique and revise its own outputs. The model acts as both the generator and the evaluator, guided by explicit rules about helpfulness and harmlessness.